Section 41: Effect of accepting performance from third person

Indian Contract Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1872

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 41

Section 41 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 enacts the doctrine of discharge by third-party performance, providing that when a promisee accepts performance of the promise from a third person, he cannot afterwards enforce it against the original promisor.

  • Voluntary Acceptance of Performance by Promisee: The promisee must knowingly and voluntarily accept actual performance tendered by a third party in satisfaction of the contractual obligation.
  • Absolute Extinguishment of Promisor's Liability: Once third-party performance is accepted, the promisor's liability towards the promisee is completely and irrevocably extinguished; the promisee cannot subsequently demand performance or sue the promisor.
  • Independence of Promisor-Third Party Recourse: The statutory discharge operates strictly between the promisee and promisor; it does not impair independent subrogation, indemnity, or contribution rights between the third party and the promisor.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Kapurchand Godha v. Mir Nawab Himayatalikhan Azamjah (1963) 2 SCR 168 / AIR 1963 SC 250: The Supreme Court held that where a creditor accepted a lesser sum from a third-party committee in full satisfaction of a claim against the debtor, Section 41 operated as an absolute bar against recovering the balance from the original debtor.
  • Union of India v. Chaman Lal Loona & Co. 1957 SCR 1039: The Supreme Court affirmed that acceptance of contractual performance from an authorized third party operates as an absolute discharge of the primary promisor under Section 41.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When representing a borrower or corporate entity where a parent company, director, or affiliate settled a vendor invoice or bank liability, plead Section 41 accompanied by bank credit receipts or no-dues acknowledgments. Argue that the creditor's acceptance of performance from the third party extinguished the cause of action, barring any residual claim against the primary debtor.