Section 219: When agent's remuneration becomes due

Indian Contract Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1872

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 219

Section 219 governs the accrual of an agent's remuneration, establishing that in the absence of a contract to the contrary, payment becomes due only upon the complete performance of the commissioned act, while preserving the agent's right of possessory detention.

  • Complete Performance as Condition Precedent: Unless the agency agreement provides for periodic retainers or milestone stages, an agent is not entitled to claim commission until he has fully executed the bargained act.
  • Doctrine of 'Effective Cause': In brokerage, commission agency, and estate agency, the agent earns remuneration only if his introduction, negotiation, or intervention was the direct and effective cause of the concluded contract.
  • Statutory Right of Detention: Section 219 expressly empowers the agent to detain the goods and property of the principal in his possession until accrued remuneration is discharged.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Vasantha v. D.R. Sundararajan (2000) 2 LW 838 (Mad): The Madras High Court held that a property broker cannot claim commission merely because he introduced a prospective buyer; he must prove that his efforts were the proximate and effective cause of the executed sale deed.
  • Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd. v. Cooper [1941] AC 108: The House of Lords established that where an agent's commission is payable upon the completion of a transaction, no term can be implied that the principal will not refuse to proceed with the sale, absent bad faith.
  • Green v. Bartlett (1863) 14 CB (NS) 681: Authoritative principle recognized across Indian High Courts that an agent who introduces a purchaser who subsequently buys directly from the principal remains entitled to commission as the effective cause.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In drafting commercial agency and consultancy agreements, eliminate ambiguity by defining whether commission triggers upon the execution of a binding contract, receipt of consideration, or financial closing. When defending against an unjustified brokerage suit, demonstrate that the transaction closed through independent negotiations without the agent's causal contribution.