Home  /  Indian Contract Act  /  Section 205

Section 205: Compensation for revocation by principal, or renunciation by agent

Indian Contract Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 1872
Section 204 All 266 Sections of Indian Contract Act Section 206

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 205

Section 205 creates a statutory cause of action for compensation where there is an express or implied contract that the agency should continue for a specified period, and either the principal revokes or the agent renounces the agency before that period expires without sufficient cause.

  • Express or Implied Agreement on Duration: The agency contract contains a stipulated term, fixed duration, or tenure (e.g., 3-year distributorship, 5-year exclusive agency) agreed between principal and agent.
  • Premature Revocation or Renunciation: The principal terminates the agency or the agent renounces the appointment prior to the expiry of the agreed tenure.
  • Absence of 'Sufficient Cause': The premature termination occurs without lawful justification (such as gross misconduct, fraud, or breach of essential covenants), triggering liability to pay compensation for lost profits and disruption.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Amritsar Gas Service (1991) 1 SCC 533: The Supreme Court held that where a distributorship or commercial agency is terminated contrary to contract, the remedy is compensation under Section 205 read with Section 73, rather than specific performance or restoration of agency.
  • Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd. v. Shirlaw [1940] AC 701: The House of Lords established that a company cannot breach an implied term of a fixed-term managing agency by prematurely removing the agent without incurring liability for damages.
  • Crocker Horlock Ltd. v. B. Lang & Co. Ltd. [1949] 1 All ER 526: The Court held that wrongful repudiation of a fixed-term sole agency entitles the agent to damages assessed on the basis of prospective commissions he would have earned during the unexpired term.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In commercial agency, dealership, and franchise litigation, specific performance of an agency contract is barred by Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Therefore, counsel must frame the claim as a damages suit under Section 205. Plead projected commissions, historical profitability, unamortized capital investments, and severance costs for the unexpired contractual period.

Section 204 All 266 Sections of Indian Contract Act Section 206