Home  /  Consumer Protection Act  /  Section 67

Section 67: Appeal against order of National Commission

Consumer Protection Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2019
Section 66 All 107 Sections of Consumer Protection Act Section 68

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 67

Section 67 creates a direct statutory appeal to the Supreme Court against original orders passed by the National Commission, subject to a strict thirty-day limitation period and a mandatory pre-deposit of fifty percent of the awarded amount.

  • Direct Supreme Court Statutory Appeal: Grants an aggrieved party the right of appeal to the Supreme Court exclusively against original orders passed by the NCDRC under Section 58(1)(a)(i) or (ii).
  • Thirty-Day Limitation and Condonation: Prescribes an appeal period of thirty days from the date of the order; the Supreme Court possesses discretionary authority to condone delay upon sufficient cause shown.
  • Mandatory 50% Pre-Deposit Condition Precedent: Proviso mandates that no appeal by a person required to pay an amount under the NCDRC order shall be entertained unless fifty percent of the amount awarded is deposited, functioning as a non-waivable statutory filter.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Cicily Kallarackal v. Vehicle Factory (2012) 8 SCC 524: The Supreme Court held that High Courts must not entertain Article 226 writ petitions against NCDRC orders where a direct statutory appeal lies to the Supreme Court under the Act, deprecating forum shopping.
  • Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions (P) Ltd. v. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma (2022) 2 SCC 501: The Supreme Court held that the condition of pre-deposit of 50% of the awarded amount for entertaining an appeal under consumer protection law is mandatory, condition precedent, and cannot be waived or relaxed by the appellate forum.
  • Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Ltd. v. Govindan Raghavan (2019) 5 SCC 725: A 2-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court exercised Section 67 jurisdiction to uphold consumer compensation awarded by NCDRC against arbitrary, one-sided clauses in builder-buyer contracts.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Never bypass Section 67 by filing a writ petition in the High Court against an original NCDRC order; the High Court will dismiss it in limine under Cicily Kallarackal. Ensure proof of 50% pre-deposit is appended to the Civil Appeal; for revisional or appellate NCDRC orders, file an SLP under Article 136 or Art 227 petition in the High Court as per Ibrat Faheem.

Section 66 All 107 Sections of Consumer Protection Act Section 68