Section 72: Power to nominate

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 72

Section 72 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers every holder of corporate securities to nominate a person to whom the securities shall vest upon death, containing a non-obstante clause that facilitates transmission while subjecting the nominee to fiduciary accountability to lawful heirs under succession law.

  • Statutory Right of Nomination: Every holder of securities of a company may, at any time, nominate a person in Form SH-13 to whom his securities shall vest in the event of his death; joint holders may together nominate a person.
  • Non-Obstante Clause and Corporate Vesting: Section 72(3) provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law or testamentary disposition, the nominee becomes entitled to all rights in the securities upon the death of the holder, entitling the company to register transmission upon submission of death certificate.
  • Nominee as Fiduciary Custodian, Not Beneficial Owner: While the non-obstante clause insulates the company from third-party claims upon effecting transmission, the Supreme Court has definitively settled that nomination does not override the general law of testamentary or intestate succession; the nominee holds the securities as a fiduciary trustee for the legal heirs.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Shakti Yezdani v. Jamshed Kanga, (2024) 4 SCC 642 : 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1679: The Supreme Court settled decades of conflict (overruling Harsha Nitin Kokate and affirming Ram Chander Talwar & Sarbati Devi), holding that the non-obstante clause in Section 72 does not confer absolute beneficial ownership on the nominee; the nominee is merely a temporary legal custodian holding the shares in trust for the legal heirs entitled under succession law.
  • Smt. Sarbati Devi v. Smt. Usha Devi, (1984) 1 SCC 424: The foundational Supreme Court authority establishing that nomination under commercial statutes does not create a parallel line of succession; a nominee merely receives the property to discharge corporate requirements and holds it subject to the claims of legal heirs under personal law.
  • Harsha Nitin Kokate v. Saraswat Co-op Bank Ltd., (2010) 4 Comp LJ 368 (Bom): Expressly overruled by the Supreme Court in Shakti Yezdani; its holding that nomination confers absolute title on the nominee to the exclusion of legal heirs was declared bad law.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In corporate transmission disputes, the company is statutorily discharged upon registering the nominee under Section 72 read with Form SH-13. However, if representing excluded legal heirs, do not sue the company for transmission; immediately file a partition or administration suit before the Civil Court citing Shakti Yezdani v. Jamshed Kanga to obtain an interim injunction restraining the nominee from selling, transferring, or voting the shares.