Section 62: Further issue of share capital

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 62

Section 62 governs the further issue of share capital, establishing pre-emptive rights of existing shareholders (Rights Issue), employee stock option schemes (ESOP), and preferential allotments.

  • Statutory Rights & Obligations: Section 62(1)(a) requires that whenever a company with share capital proposes to increase its subscribed capital, the shares must first be offered to existing equity shareholders in proportion to their paid-up capital (Rights Issue).
  • Operational Statutory Rights & Obligations: The offer must remain open for between fifteen to thirty days, and unless the articles provide otherwise, includes a right of renunciation in favor of third parties.
  • Sub-Section (1) Provision: Sub-section (1)(b) allows issues to employees under ESOP schemes authorized by special resolution.
  • Core Legal Standard: Sub-section (1)(c) permits preferential allotments to any persons (for cash or consideration other than cash) authorized by a special resolution and supported by a registered valuer's valuation report.

Sub-sections (4) through (6) govern the conversion of government loans or debentures into shares in public interest.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Dale & Carrington Investment P. Ltd. v. P.K. Prathapan (2005) 1 SCC 212: The Supreme Court held that directors stand in a fiduciary position and cannot issue additional shares under Section 62 for the collateral purpose of converting a majority shareholder into a minority; an improper share allotment is an act of oppression and void.
  • Needle Industries (India) Ltd. v. Needle Industries Newey (India) Holding Ltd. (1981) 3 SCC 333: The Supreme Court ruled that a rights issue must be genuine and motivated by the commercial needs of the company; where shares are issued at an undervalue or with short notice to dilute a shareholder group, the court will intervene.
  • Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 9 SCC 449: The Supreme Court reaffirmed that board powers to raise capital must be exercised in good faith for company purposes, and proportionate rights issues offered equally to all shareholders generally negate allegations of oppression.
Legal Commentary:

Section 62 is the primary battleground in corporate control contests and private equity investments. Fiduciary duties of directors codified under Section 166 apply with full force to Section 62 issuances. Any preferential allotment that bypasses existing shareholders without a comprehensive registered valuer report or valid special resolution is liable to be struck down by the NCLT as an oppressive dilution of member equity.