Section 403: Fee for filing, etc

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 403

Section 403 prescribes the statutory scheme for payment of fees, additional fees, and compounding penalties for timely and belated delivery of corporate documents to the Registrar.

  • Timely Filing within Prescribed Period: Requires any document, fact, or information required to be filed under the Act to be submitted within the specific statutory period upon payment of the prescribed fee.
  • Delayed Filing with Additional Fees: Allows submission of delayed documents after the expiry of the statutory period upon payment of prescribed additional fees, which escalate based on the period of delay.
  • Immunity and Defaulter Ineligibility: Restricts persistent defaulting companies from filing certain statutory returns without payment of higher cascading fees, while preserving executive power to introduce one-time settlement and compliance amnesty schemes.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Techno E-Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies, 2018 SCC OnLine NCLAT 484: The NCLAT held that payment of additional fees under Section 403 cures procedural delay in filing returns, but does not grant automatic immunity from criminal prosecution for substantive non-compliances.
  • Radhey Shyam Tulsian v. Registrar of Companies, (2002) 110 Comp Cas 351 (Cal): Held that the statutory scheme allowing delayed filings upon payment of additional fees provides an administrative mechanism to regularize records without nullifying corporate acts.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In compounding applications under Section 441, demonstrate that the delayed return has since been filed with the Registrar along with requisite additional fees under Section 403. Establishing that the registry records are current and that no creditor suffered prejudice constitutes a compelling ground for mitigating compounding fees.