Section 389: Registration of prospectus

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 389

Section 389 mandates that no person shall issue, circulate, or distribute in India any prospectus offering shares or debentures of a foreign company unless a certified copy has been formally registered with the Registrar of Companies.

  • Mandatory Pre-Circulation Registration: Imposes an absolute statutory bar against issuing, circulating, or distributing any foreign prospectus in India before delivering a copy to the Registrar for registration.
  • Requisite Authorizations and Signatures: Requires the delivered copy to be signed by the chairperson and two other directors of the foreign company or their agents authorized in writing.
  • Concomitant Enclosures: Mandates that the registered prospectus be accompanied by the written consents of experts, copies of material contracts, and verified translations of foreign constituent instruments.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Nash v. Lynde, [1929] AC 158: The House of Lords held that the term 'issue of prospectus' implies offering securities to the public at large, necessitating formal delivery and registration to safeguard prospective subscribers.
  • Pramatha Nath Sanyal v. Kali Kumar Dutt, AIR 1925 Cal 714: Held that distributing advertisement circulars inviting investment without prior statutory registration with the Registrar invalidates the solicitation and constitutes an offense under company law.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In securities litigation or regulatory enforcement, challenge the validity of any foreign private placement or public solicitation that lacked prior registration under Section 389. Seek an interim injunction restraining wire transfers or depository credits, pleading that unregistered distribution constitutes an unlawful offer under the Act.