Section 375: Winding up of unregistered companies

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 375

Section 375 of the Companies Act, 2013 governs the winding up of unregistered companies by the Tribunal, establishing statutory grounds including inability to pay debts and just and equitable considerations, while expressly prohibiting voluntary liquidation.

  • Definition of Unregistered Company: Includes any partnership, association, or company consisting of more than seven members, excluding railway companies, companies registered under this Act, or companies formed under previous company laws.
  • Absolute Prohibition of Voluntary Winding Up: An unregistered company cannot be wound up voluntarily under this Act; winding up can only be ordered by the Tribunal.
  • Statutory Grounds for Winding Up: May be wound up if dissolved or defunct, if unable to pay its debts (including failure to satisfy a statutory demand exceeding one lakh rupees within three weeks), or if the Tribunal considers it just and equitable.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • V.V. Krishna Iyer Sons v. New Era Mfg. Co. Ltd., AIR 1965 Ker 241: The Division Bench held that an unregistered partnership firm with more than seven members can be wound up by the court under Section 582/583 of the 1956 Act (now Section 375) upon proving inability to pay debts.
  • Hind Overseas (P) Ltd. v. Raghunath Prasad Jhunjhunwalla, (1976) 3 SCC 259: The Supreme Court established that the 'just and equitable' ground for winding up applies with full force to quasi-partnerships and associations where mutual confidence has completely broken down.
  • Re: Russian Bank for Foreign Trade, [1933] Ch 745: The Chancery Division held that courts possess complete jurisdiction to wind up an unregistered foreign or domestic association that has assets and unpaid liabilities within the forum.
  • Seth Mohan Lal v. Grain Chambers Ltd., AIR 1968 SC 772: The Supreme Court analyzed the statutory boundaries of winding up unregistered associations, holding that the jurisdiction is designed to prevent unadministered commercial anarchy.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When petitioning to wind up an unregistered partnership or association under Section 375, prove in the petition that the entity has more than seven members to satisfy the jurisdictional threshold. Serve a formal statutory demand under Section 375(3)(a) demanding payment within three weeks; non-payment provides prima facie statutory proof of inability to pay debts.