Home  /  Companies Act  /  Section 334

Section 334: Transfers, etc., after commencement of winding up to be void

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Section 333 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 335
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)
Company Sec 2(20) Director Sec 2(34) Tribunal Sec 2(90)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 334

Section 334 of the Companies Act, 2013 declares void any disposition of company property, and any transfer of shares or alteration in the status of members made after the commencement of winding up, unless expressly validated by the Tribunal.

  • Commencement Date Trigger: The statutory voidness attaches from the date of commencement of winding up (the date of presentation of the winding up petition under Section 357).
  • Automatic Voidness of Property Dispositions: In a winding up by the Tribunal, any alienation, transfer, encumbrance, or payment of company property executed after commencement is void ipso jure unless validated by court order.
  • Judicial Validation Jurisdiction: The Tribunal retains equitable jurisdiction to validate bona fide transactions entered into post-petition if executed in the ordinary course of business for the preservation of corporate assets and protection of creditors.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Pankaj Mehra v. State of Maharashtra, (2000) 2 SCC 756: The Supreme Court held that Section 536(2) of the 1956 Act (pari materia to Section 334) does not render payments by cheque non-est automatically for criminal liability under Section 138 NI Act, but establishes that validation by the Company Court protects commercial transactions entered into in good faith.
  • J.K. (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. v. New Kaiser-I-Hind Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd., AIR 1970 SC 1041: Affirmed that post-petition dispositions are void unless validated, ensuring that the company's assets remain in custodial status for equitable distribution among all creditors.
  • Kamani Tubes Ltd. v. Indian Bank, (2008) 141 Comp Cas 490 (Bom): Held that the Tribunal will validate a post-commencement transaction only if the applicant demonstrates that the disposition was for the benefit of the company and not to defeat creditor pari passu rights.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Third parties dealing with a company against which a winding up petition has been presented must immediately apply to the Tribunal under Section 334 for prospective or ex-post facto validation. Pleading must demonstrate that the transaction infused liquidity, preserved going-concern operations, or prevented catastrophic asset devaluation.

Section 333 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 335