Home  /  Companies Act  /  Section 301

Section 301: Arrest of person trying to leave India or abscond

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Section 300 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 302
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)
Company Sec 2(20) Director Sec 2(34) Tribunal Sec 2(90)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 301

Section 301 of the Companies Act, 2013 vests emergency preventive powers in the Tribunal to issue warrants for the arrest and detention of any contributory, director, or person liable to contribute or having property of the company who is reasonably believed to be absconding, quitting India, or concealing property to evade calls or judicial examination.

  • Probable Cause and Flight/Concealment Risk: The Tribunal must be satisfied upon reasonable cause that a contributory or person having company books or property is about to quit India, abscond, or remove/conceal assets to evade payment of calls or avoid examination concerning corporate affairs.
  • Preventive Detention and Safe Custody: Empowers the Tribunal to issue a coercive warrant causing the named individual to be arrested and detained in safe custody until such time as the Tribunal may order or until adequate solvent security is provided.
  • Impounding of Records, Passports, and Movable Assets: Authorizes simultaneous search, seizure, and impounding of the examinee's books, papers, ledgers, movable effects, and traveling documents to prevent the destruction of forensic evidence.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India, (2014) 8 SCC 470: The Supreme Court affirmed that judicial forums possessing coercive jurisdiction over corporate winding up and restitution can restrain contemnors and corporate officers from leaving the country and order detention to secure obedience to judicial mandates.
  • Official Liquidator v. S.D. Parekh, (1974) 44 Comp Cas 126 (Guj): The Gujarat High Court held that coercive warrants of arrest and asset seizure under liquidation provisions require concrete evidence of intentional flight or fraudulent asset concealment, rather than speculative apprehensions.
  • Re: Imperial Mercantile Credit Co., (1867) LR 5 Eq 264: Established that arrest and seizure powers during corporate liquidation are drastic emergency remedies intended to preserve the subject matter of winding up and prevent the total defeat of judicial proceedings.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When seeking an arrest warrant or asset seizure under Section 301, counsel for the liquidator must submit concrete documentary evidence establishing overt flight risk (such as international flight bookings, offshore asset transfers, or failure to appear in response to multiple summonses). When defending, counsel must invoke Article 21 constitutional safeguards, deposit the client's passport with the Tribunal registrar, furnish a solvent personal bond, and demonstrate that the respondent is ready to cooperate with all examinations to have the arrest warrant recalled.

Section 300 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 302