Section 299: Power to summon persons suspected of having property of company, etc

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 299

Section 299 of the Companies Act, 2013 arms the Tribunal with extraordinary inquisitorial powers to summon and examine any person suspected of possessing company property, books, or papers, or capable of providing information concerning corporate formation, trade, dealings, or affairs.

  • Extraordinary Inquisitorial Summons: The Tribunal may, at any time after appointing a provisional liquidator or making a winding-up order, summon any officer of the company or person suspected of having custody of company property or indebted to it.
  • Scope of Inquiry and Examination: Empowers the Tribunal to examine summoned persons on oath, either orally or by written interrogatories, concerning the promotion, formation, trade, dealings, affairs, or property of the company.
  • Production of Books and Coercive Warrants: The Tribunal may compel the production of any books and papers in the witness's custody, and if any person fails to appear after tender of reasonable expenses, the Tribunal may issue a warrant for his arrest and production.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Re: British Building Stone Co. Ltd., [1908] 2 Ch 450: The court established that the statutory power to summon and examine persons suspected of holding corporate property is inquisitorial in character, conferred to assist the liquidator in uncovering hidden assets and unraveling transactions without being bound by ordinary civil procedure constraints.
  • Official Liquidator v. Bapu, AIR 1961 Bom 228: The Bombay High Court held that proceedings under Section 477 (now Section 299) are in the nature of discovery to aid the court in safeguarding the estate, and witnesses cannot refuse examination on grounds of private confidentiality or self-incrimination.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When evidence indicates that erstwhile directors have routed funds to third-party front entities or concealed intellectual property, the liquidator should file an ex parte application under Section 299 setting forth a prima facie narrative of concealment. Counsel should request simultaneous issuance of summons and a direction to produce original ledgers and electronic drives, backed by a conditional bailable warrant.