1. The Tribunal shall, for the purpose of effective implementation of the scheme, have power to enforce, modify or terminate any contract or agreement or any obligation pursuant to such agreement or contract entered into by the company with any other person.
2. The Tribunal may, if it deems necessary or expedient so to do, by order in writing, authorise the company administrator appointed under section 259 to implement a sanctioned scheme till its successful implementation on such terms and conditions as may be specified in the order and may for that purpose require him to file periodic reports on the implementation of the sanctioned scheme.
3. Where the whole or substantial assets of the undertaking of the sick company are sold under a sanctioned scheme, the sale proceeds shall be applied towards implementation of the scheme in such manner as the Tribunal may direct:
Provided that: debtors and creditors shall have the power to scrutinise and make an appeal for review of the value before final order of fixing value.
4. Where it is difficult to implement the scheme for any reason or the scheme fails due to non-implementation of obligations under the scheme by the parties concerned, the company administrator authorised to implement the scheme and where there is no such administrator, the company, the secured creditors, or the transferee company in a case of amalgamation, may make an application before the Tribunal for modification of the scheme or to declare the scheme as failed and that the company may be wound up.
5. The Tribunal shall, within thirty days of presentation of an application under sub-section (4 ), pass an order for modification of the scheme or, as the case may be, declaring the scheme as failed and pass an order for the winding up of the company if three-fourths in value of the secured creditors consent to the modification of the scheme or winding up of the company.
6. Where an application under sub-section (4 ) has been made before the Tribunal and such application is pending before it, such application shall abate, if the secured creditors representing not less than three-fourths in value of the amount outstanding against financial assistance disbursed to the sick company have taken any measures to recover their secured debt under sub-section (4 ) of section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 264
Section 264 historically empowered the Tribunal to supervise and enforce the implementation of sanctioned revival schemes; omitted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, its implementation framework is now exercised through Monitoring Committees and Section 60(5) of the IBC.
If a third party, bank, or government body obstructs the handover of assets or refuses to release mortgages following plan approval, file an implementation application under Section 60(5) IBC before the NCLT seeking mandatory injunctions and coercive contempt directions against defaulting officials.