Section 253: Determination of sickness

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 253

Section 253 historically governed the determination of corporate sickness by the Tribunal under Chapter XIX; omitted by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, its sickness-based framework was replaced by the creditor-driven default mechanism under Part II of the IBC.

  • Historical Determination of Sickness: Under the original Chapter XIX scheme, provided for an application to the NCLT by secured creditors or the company upon default exceeding statutory thresholds to declare the company sick.
  • Standstill and Interim Protection: Contemplated a 60-day inquiry window during which the Tribunal could restrain the disposal of corporate assets while assessing the prospect of rehabilitation.
  • Legislative Omission and Paradigm Shift: Formally omitted by Section 255 read with the Eleventh Schedule of the IBC, 2016, ending the era of SICA-style sickness adjudication and replacing it with the swift 'default' test under Sections 7, 9, and 10 of the IBC.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Innoventive Industries Ltd. v. ICICI Bank, (2018) 1 SCC 407: The Supreme Court delivered the landmark ruling explaining the shift from the sickness-based determination under Chapter XIX / SICA to the default-based CIRP trigger under IBC, rendering management sickness defenses obsolete.
  • Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, (2019) 4 SCC 17: Traced the systemic breakdown of sickness rehabilitation under SICA and the Companies Act, upholding the constitutional validity of replacing debtor-in-possession models with creditor-led resolution under IBC.
  • Madras Petrochem Ltd. v. BIFR, (2016) 4 SCC 1: Analyzed how protracted sickness inquiries under prior enactments frustrated secured creditor recoveries, justifying comprehensive legislative overhaul.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Advise corporate clients that corporate sickness is no longer an actionable ground or defense under company law. Any revival or debt restructuring must proceed via CIRP under Section 7, 9, or 10 of the IBC, where proof of debt and default exceeding the statutory threshold of one crore rupees is the sole jurisdictional prerequisite.