Section 251: Fraudulent application for removal of name

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 251

Section 251 of the Companies Act, 2013 establishes severe civil and criminal consequences for making a fraudulent application for removal of name under Section 248, imposing unlimited joint and several personal liability on managing persons and mandating criminal prosecution under Section 447.

  • Deceitful Evading of Corporate Liabilities: Operates where an application under Section 248(2) is made with the objective of evading debts, deceiving creditors, or defrauding any stakeholder or tax authority.
  • Unlimited Joint and Several Civil Indemnity: Imposes direct, joint, and several liability upon every person in charge of management toward any person who suffers loss or damage as a result of the dissolution.
  • Mandatory Section 447 Criminal Prosecution: Mandates that culpable managers shall be punishable for corporate fraud under Section 447, carrying mandatory imprisonment from six months up to ten years along with hefty fines, with additional power for RoC to recommend state prosecution.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Venkatesh Dutt v. Registrar of Companies, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 7845: The Delhi High Court held that filing false indemnities and affidavits certifying 'nil liabilities' in Form STK-2 constitutes fraud under Section 251 read with Section 447, sustaining criminal prosecution of the directors.
  • Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) v. Bhushan Steel Ltd., 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10834: Affirmed that Section 447 penalizes deliberate corporate deception and asset concealment, and fraudulent dissolution cannot serve as a haven against investigative agencies.
  • Dr. A. Shanmugam v. N.K. Anbualagan, (2012) 6 SCC 430: The Supreme Court held that fraud vitiates every solemn act, and administrative orders obtained by deceit or suppression of material facts are legal nullities that expose the perpetrators to exemplary damages.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When representing a defrauded creditor whose debtor company dissolved via Form STK-2, obtain the indemnity bonds and affidavits filed by directors from MCA records. File a composite proceeding before the Special Court under Section 251/447 and petition the NCLT under Section 252(3) for simultaneous company revival and personal asset freezing.