Section 248: Power of Registrar to remove name of company from register of companies

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 248

Section 248 empowers the Registrar of Companies to strike off defunct, inoperative, or non-compliant companies, and permits companies to apply voluntarily for removal of name.

  • Sub-Section (2): Form: Under sub-section (2), a company may itself apply in Form STK-2 after extinguishing all liabilities and obtaining consent of seventy-five percent members in paid-up share capital.
  • Core Legal Standard: Notice of strike-off must be published in the Official Gazette and MCA portal.

Sub-section (7) expressly provides that the liability of every director, manager, and member shall continue and may be enforced as if the company had not been dissolved.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Purushottamdass v. Registrar of Companies (1986) 60 Comp Cas 154 (Bom): The High Court held that striking off a company dissolves its corporate status, but continuing statutory liabilities and claims of creditors remain enforceable against the directors personally.
  • Helen C. Rebello v. Maharashtra SRTC (1999) 1 SCC 90: The Supreme Court recognized that statutory removal of corporate names from registers cleanses the public register of defunct and inactive commercial entities.
Legal Commentary:

Section 248 is the MCA's primary administrative scalpel against shell companies. Over five lakh companies have been struck off under Section 248 for failing to file financial returns for two consecutive years. Crucially, strike-off immediately freezes company bank accounts; directors cannot access funds until the company is formally restored by the NCLT under Section 252.