Section 242: Powers of Tribunal

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 242

Section 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 equips the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) with expansive statutory powers to fashion equitable remedies on an application under Section 241, enabling the Tribunal to bring an end to acts of oppression and mismanagement without liquidating a viable commercial entity.

  • Broad Equitable Jurisdiction: Empowers the Tribunal to pass any order it thinks fit to bring an end to the matters complained of, including regulating the conduct of company affairs and ordering share buybacks.
  • Statutory Preconditions for Relief: Requires proof that the company's affairs are being conducted prejudicially or oppressively, and that winding up would unfairly prejudice members though winding-up grounds otherwise exist.
  • Interim Protective Restraints: Under Section 242(4), authorizes the Tribunal to issue urgent interim injunctions restraining board decisions, altering share capital, or appointing interim administrators.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 9 SCC 449: Supreme Court settled that NCLT cannot re-write corporate contracts or reinstate directors under Section 242 in the absence of demonstrable, pervasive oppression.
  • Needle Industries (India) Ltd. v. Needle Industries Newey (India) Holding Ltd. (1981) 3 SCC 333: Supreme Court established that an isolated illegal act does not constitute oppression unless accompanied by mala fides and systemic unfair conduct.
  • Hanuman Prasad Bagri v. Bagress Cereals Pvt. Ltd. (2001) 4 SCC 420: Supreme Court affirmed that to obtain relief under Section 242, the petitioner must prove that just and equitable grounds for winding up exist.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In oppression petitions before NCLT, establish both limbs of Section 242: demonstrate prejudice to company interests and show that winding up would destroy enterprise value, justifying judicial restructuring of board control.