Section 235: Power to acquire shares of shareholders dissenting from scheme or contract approved by majority

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 235

Section 235 governs the statutory 'squeeze-out' of dissenting minority shareholders where an acquisition scheme is approved by holders of not less than nine-tenths in value of the target shares.

  • Evidentiary Proof & Admissibility: Section 235 provides that where a scheme or contract involving the transfer of shares in a company to another company has been approved by the holders of not less than nine-tenths (ninety percent) in value of the shares whose transfer is involved within four months of the offer, the transferee company may, within two months thereafter, give notice in prescribed Form CAA-14 to any dissenting.
  • Operational Evidentiary Proof & Admissibility: Upon notice, the transferee company becomes entitled and bound to acquire those shares on the same terms as approved by the ninety percent majority, unless the NCLT on an application made by the dissenting shareholder within one month thinks fit to order otherwise.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Akil Hirani, In re (2002) 109 Comp Cas 107 (Bom): The High Court held that the 90% shareholder approval creates a strong statutory presumption of commercial fairness; the dissenting minority bears a heavy burden to prove that the valuation is unfair, fraudulent, or oppressive.
  • AIG (Mauritius) LLC v. Tata Televentures (Holdings) Ltd. (2003) 43 SCL 22 (Del): The High Court held that where the statutory 90% majority of shareholders has approved an acquisition scheme under the squeeze-out mechanism, the court or tribunal will not intervene with the compulsory acquisition unless the dissenting shareholders establish palpable unfairness or fraud.
  • Re: Sussex Brick Co. Ltd. [1961] 1 All ER 23: The court established that the statutory squeeze-out threshold of 90% prevents a tiny recalcitrant minority from extorting ransom from an acquirer when the vast majority has accepted a fair commercial scheme.
Legal Commentary:

Section 235 is the primary statutory mechanism for full corporate takeovers and de-listing. Once the 90% threshold is crossed, the acquirer can legally extinguish minority shareholdings. The dissenting shareholder's challenge before the NCLT must establish palpable fraud or severe undervaluation; courts will not overturn the commercial wisdom of a 90% shareholder majority on subjective notions of value.