Home  /  Companies Act  /  Section 228

Section 228: Investigation, etc., of foreign companies

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Section 227 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 229
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)
Company Sec 2(20) Director Sec 2(34) Tribunal Sec 2(90)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 228

Section 228 of the Companies Act, 2013 extends the application of Chapter XIV to foreign companies, granting statutory inspection, inquiry, and investigation powers over foreign entities conducting business in India irrespective of their overseas incorporation.

  • Mutatis Mutandis Extraterritorial Application: Declares that the entirety of Chapter XIV (Sections 206 to 229) applies mutatis mutandis to foreign companies carrying on business in India under Section 2(42).
  • Regulatory Oversight Over Indian Undertakings: Subjects Indian branch offices, liaison offices, project offices, and digital commercial operations of foreign companies to the inspection and search powers of the RoC and SFIO.
  • Enforcement Against Overseas Management and Agents: Empowers statutory inspectors to examine Indian representatives, designated agents, and foreign directors who manage Indian commercial operations.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Union of India v. Western Maharashtra Development Corp. Ltd., (2006) 130 Comp Cas 490 (Bom): Held that foreign corporations carrying on business in India voluntarily subject their Indian undertakings to domestic corporate regulatory enforcement, empowering statutory authorities to inspect and investigate Indian operations.
  • Macquarie Bank Ltd. v. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd., (2018) 2 SCC 358: Affirmed the robust territorial application of Indian commercial laws over foreign entities participating in Indian commerce, ensuring parity of regulatory obligations with domestic corporate vehicles.
  • Yukong Line Ltd. of Seoul v. Rendsburg Investments Corp., [1998] 1 WLR 294: Recognized that corporate entities incorporated in foreign tax havens or overseas jurisdictions cannot plead foreign status to shield local fraudulent transactions or evade statutory investigation in the host state.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When representing foreign parent corporations with Indian branch offices or place of business under Section 2(42), resist regulatory fishing inquiries targeting global books unrelated to Indian transactions. Argue that Section 228 mutatis mutandis application is territorially confined to books, papers, and transactions attributable to the Indian business establishment, requiring authorities to obtain letters rogatory under Section 217(11) if they seek records situated in foreign parent jurisdictions.

Section 227 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 229