Home  /  Companies Act  /  Section 223

Section 223: Inspector?s report

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Section 222 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 224
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)
Company Sec 2(20) Director Sec 2(34) Tribunal Sec 2(90)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 223

Section 223 of the Companies Act, 2013 regulates the submission of interim and final investigation reports by inspectors to the Central Government, providing for their authentication and establishing their statutory admissibility as evidence of the inspector's opinion in subsequent legal proceedings.

  • Interim and Final Reporting Mandate: Obligates the inspector to submit interim reports if directed by the Central Government, and to submit a comprehensive, reasoned final report upon the conclusion of the investigation.
  • Discretionary Administrative Distribution: Empowers the Central Government to furnish authenticated copies of the report to the investigated company, prosecuting authorities, or petitioning shareholders under Section 213 upon application.
  • Statutory Evidentiary Admissibility: Expressly declares that any report authenticated by the company's seal or certified by the authorized public officer having custody thereof is admissible in legal proceedings as evidence of the inspector's opinion.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board, AIR 1967 SC 295: The Supreme Court held that an inspector's report represents an investigative opinion that enables the executive to determine appropriate legal remedies; it does not operate as an unappealable judicial decree of civil or criminal liability.
  • Gopal Khaitan v. State, AIR 1969 Cal 132: Affirmed that under statutory reporting provisions, an inspector's report is admissible to prove the official opinion formed by the investigator, but substantive criminal convictions require independent proof of primary facts.
  • SFIO v. Rahul Modi, (2019) 5 SCC 266: The Supreme Court held that an investigation report submitted by the SFIO under Section 212 read with Section 223 functions as a statutory police report under Section 173 CrPC, enabling the Special Court to take cognizance of corporate fraud offenses.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When representing directors implicated in a Section 223 final report, object to any prosecution attempt to treat the inspector's findings as conclusive factual evidence of guilt. While Section 223(4) makes the report admissible as evidence of the inspector's opinion, the prosecution must independently prove the primary documents and examine witnesses under Section 3 of the Evidence Act / Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam to establish fraud beyond reasonable doubt.

Section 222 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 224