Section 206: Power to call for information, inspect books and conduct inquiries

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 206

Section 206 empowers the Registrar of Companies to scrutinize corporate documents, call for information, inspect books of account, and conduct inquiries upon suspicion of fraudulent business affairs.

  • Inquiry & Trial Mechanism: Section 206 provides a multi-stage administrative investigation mechanism: Under sub-section (1), the ROC may, on scrutiny of any document, issue a written notice calling for information or explanations.
  • Sub-Section (3) Provision: Under sub-section (3), if the ROC is not satisfied or no explanation is furnished, he may call for production of books of account and documents.
  • Sub-Section (4): Registrar: Sub-section (4) empowers the Registrar to conduct an inquiry if he has reasonable cause to believe, on information received or representation made, that the business of a company is being carried on for a fraudulent or unlawful purpose or in a manner oppressive to investors.
  • Sub-Section (5): Central: Sub-section (5) empowers the Central Government to authorize any statutory inspector to inspect books of account.

Default in furnishing information attracts statutory fines and triggers investigation under Section 210.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Barium Chemicals Ltd. v. Company Law Board AIR 1967 SC 295: The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held that administrative powers to order inquiries and inspect corporate books require bona fide subjective satisfaction based on prima facie objective material showing fraud or misconduct.
  • Rohtas Industries Ltd. v. S.D. Agarwal (1969) 1 SCC 325: The Supreme Court held that the regulatory power to inspect and inquire cannot be exercised arbitrarily, vindictively, or for fishing expeditions; there must be real, relevant material showing corporate misconduct.
Legal Commentary:

Section 206 is the initial investigative trigger utilized by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. When the ROC issues a Section 206(4) show-cause notice alleging fraudulent business conduct, the company must provide comprehensive contemporaneous documentation. Unsatisfactory replies under Section 206 almost invariably culminate in a full-scale corporate investigation under Section 210 or reference to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under Section 212.