Section 197: Overall maximum managerial remuneration and managerial remuneration in case of absence or inadequacy of profits

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 197

Section 197 prescribes the statutory ceiling on managerial remuneration (11% of net profits) in public companies, regulating executive compensation during profit inadequacy under Schedule V.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 197(1) establishes that the total managerial remuneration payable by a public company to its directors (including MD and WTD) in respect of any financial year shall not exceed eleven percent of the net profits of that company calculated under Section 198.
  • Operational Mechanism: The company in general meeting may, with special resolution, authorize remuneration exceeding eleven percent subject to Schedule V.
  • Procedural Rule: The section establishes individual caps: remuneration to any one MD/WTD cannot exceed five percent of net profits (ten percent if more than one), and remuneration to non-executive directors cannot exceed one percent (three percent if no MD/WTD).
  • Statutory Requirement: Where a company has no profits or inadequate profits, remuneration must strictly adhere to Section II of Part II of Schedule V (based on effective capital tiers).

Sub-section (9) mandates that any director receiving excess remuneration holds it in trust for the company and must refund it within two years.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 9 SCC 449: The Supreme Court observed that statutory regulation of managerial remuneration under Section 197 aligns executive compensation with genuine profitability, curbing excessive extraction by controlling management.
  • CIT v. Chaman Lal & Bros. (1970) 77 ITR 383 (SC): The Supreme Court held that managerial remuneration is statutory in character; payments made in excess of statutory limits without requisite approvals are ultra vires the company.
Legal Commentary:

Section 197 underwent profound liberalization when the requirement for Central Government approval was replaced with shareholder special resolution approval. However, if a company has defaulted on bank loans, debentures, or deposits, prior approval of the lending institutions/creditors is an mandatory prerequisite before passing any resolution for enhanced remuneration under the third proviso to Section 197(1).