Section 187: Investments of company to be held in its own name

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 187

Section 187 mandates that all corporate investments in shares, debentures, property, or other assets must be made and held strictly in the company's own legal name, safeguarding the corporate entity from benami holdings, asset concealment, and unauthorized nominee title.

  • Mandatory Self-Ownership of Corporate Investments: All investments made or held by a company in any property, share, debenture, or asset must be held exclusively in the company's own corporate name, upholding its independent corporate identity.
  • Exhaustive Statutory Exceptions: Permits narrow exceptions: depositing securities with banks for collection of dividends/interest, holding through depositories in dematerialized form, and vesting qualifying shares in nominee directors to maintain statutory minimum membership in a subsidiary under Section 187(1) proviso.
  • Mandatory Register of Investments in Form MBP-3: Where securities are held in the name of nominees or custodians under the statutory exceptions, Section 187(2) requires maintaining a specialized register (Form MBP-3) at the registered office, open to inspection by members and debenture-holders without fee.
  • Penal Sanctions for Benami Holdings: Non-compliance subjects the company to fines up to five lakh rupees and every defaulting officer to fines up to fifty thousand rupees, alongside severe risks of property attachment under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • CIT v. Associated Industrial Development Co. (P) Ltd., (1971) 82 ITR 586 (SC): The Supreme Court recognized that while shares may be held in the name of nominees under narrow company law exceptions, beneficial ownership and economic title remain vested exclusively in the corporate principal.
  • Bacha F. Guzdar v. CIT, AIR 1955 SC 74: Affirmed that corporate assets belong to the company as an independent juristic person and not to its shareholders, requiring that legal and equitable investments be formally registered in the company's corporate identity.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In forensic asset tracing and corporate restructuring, verify whether shares held by nominees in wholly owned subsidiaries are supported by declarations of beneficial interest under Section 89 and recorded in Form MBP-3. Omission to maintain the Section 187 register creates a severe evidentiary vulnerability during RoC inspections and benami transaction inquiries.