Section 184: Disclosure of interest by director

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 184

Section 184 mandates that every director must disclose his concern or interest in any company, firm, or entity, prohibiting interested directors from participating or voting in board meetings on conflicted contracts.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 184(1) mandates every director to disclose his concern or interest in any other companies, bodies corporate, firms, or other association of individuals (including shareholding) by giving a notice in writing in Form MBP-1 at the first board meeting in which he participates as a director, and at the first board meeting in every financial year, or whenever there is any change in disclosures.
  • Director Disclosure & Quorum Rules: Sub-section (2) mandates that every director who is in any way, directly or indirectly, concerned or interested in a contract or arrangement entered into or proposed with a body corporate or entity must disclose the nature of their concern or interest at the first Board meeting where the matter is considered.
  • Sub-Section (3) Provision: Sub-section (3) provides that any contract entered into in violation is voidable at the option of the company.

This statutory framework establishes clear operational guidelines, balancing legal compliance with procedural safeguards.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 9 SCC 449: The Supreme Court underscored that disclosure of interest under Section 184 is a fundamental fiduciary duty; interested directors are statutorily barred from voting, and contracts infected by non-disclosure violate corporate trust.
  • Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. v. Ratanchand Khimchand AIR 1953 Bom 285: The High Court affirmed that the statutory disclosure must be full, frank, and timely, enabling fellow board members to assess the transaction with knowledge of the interested director's conflict.
Legal Commentary:

Section 184 is an uncompromising statutory conflict-of-interest rule. Failure to file Form MBP-1 or participating/voting in a board meeting on an interested contract automatically triggers the lethal consequence of Section 167(1)(c)—vacation of directorship. Secretarial teams must ensure interested directors are marked as 'present but not voting' on related agenda items and excluded from the quorum.