Section 165: Number of directorships

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 165

Section 165 of the Companies Act, 2013 imposes strict statutory ceilings on the maximum number of directorships an individual may simultaneously hold, capping total directorships at twenty and public company directorships at ten, enforceable through civil daily penalties.

  • Twenty Directorship Overall Ceiling: No person can hold office as a director, including alternate directorships, in more than twenty companies simultaneously.
  • Ten Public Company Cap and Reckoning Rules: Directorship in public companies cannot exceed ten; for calculating this limit, directorships in private companies that are either holding or subsidiary companies of a public company are treated as public company directorships.
  • Statutory Exclusions and Company Self-Regulation: Directorships in dormant companies (under Section 455) and non-profit companies (under Section 8) are excluded from the statutory count; additionally, a company may, by special resolution, specify a lower directorship limit for its own directors.
  • Civil Monetary Daily Penalty under 2020 Amendment: Section 165(6) provides that accepting appointment in contravention of the limits attracts a penalty of two thousand rupees per day for continuing default, subject to a maximum ceiling of two lakh rupees.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Aruna Oswal v. Pankaj Oswal, (2020) 8 SCC 79: The Supreme Court emphasized that statutory limits on directorships are designed to preserve corporate governance integrity and ensure that directors can dedicate sufficient fiduciary attention and oversight to each corporate entity.
  • S.B. Shankar v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8931: The Delhi High Court held that the directorship cap under Section 165 is strict and mandatory, and exceeding the threshold triggers statutory liabilities and disqualification under Section 167(1)(a).
  • Sunita Aggarwal v. Registrar of Companies, 2019 SCC OnLine NCLAT 872: The NCLAT affirmed that only Section 8 and dormant companies are exempt from Section 165 calculation, and alternate directorships must be included in calculating the statutory limits.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Before issuing DIR-2 consent for any proposed director, secretarial counsel must run an exhaustive MCA portal check on the individual's existing directorships. Ensure that private companies that are subsidiaries of public companies are counted within the 10-public company threshold. If a candidate is near or exceeds the threshold, require them to execute Form DIR-11/DIR-12 resigning from excess boards prior to appointment to prevent penalty proceedings under Section 165(6) and disqualification under Section 167(1)(a).