Section 143: Powers and duties of auditors and auditing standards

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 143

Section 143 defines the powers of statutory auditors to access books and records, their mandatory reporting duties on internal financial controls, and their statutory duty to report fraud to the Central Government under Section 143(12).

  • Statutory Rights & Obligations: Section 143(1) confers unfettered rights on the auditor to access at all times the books of account and vouchers of the company, and to require from officers such information and explanations as necessary.
  • Sub-Section (12): Central: Sub-section (12) enacts a mandatory reporting command: if an auditor has reason to believe that an offense of fraud involving an amount of one crore rupees or more is being or has been committed against the company by its officers or employees, the auditor shall report the matter to the Central Government (MCA) within sixty days.

Default in reporting fraud attracts statutory fines up to twenty-five lakh rupees.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Union of India v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP (2023) 8 SCC 56: The Supreme Court held that the auditor's statutory duty to report fraud under Section 143(12) is a mandatory public duty; auditors cannot remain passive spectators while corporate assets are plundered by fraudulent promoters.
  • ICAI v. Mukesh Gang (2016) 136 CLA 448: The High Court affirmed that an auditor's failure to verify basic bank balances, physical stock, or related-party advances constitutes gross professional negligence and breach of statutory duties under Section 143.
Legal Commentary:

Section 143(12) transformed statutory auditors from traditional corporate whistleblowers into mandated enforcement informants for the Central Government. When an auditor uncovers fraud exceeding one crore rupees, he must follow the strict Rule 13 protocol: seeking board comments within fifteen days and submitting Form ADT-4 directly to the MCA Secretary. Failure to file ADT-4 triggers personal prosecution of the audit partner under Section 448.