Section 13: Alteration of memorandum

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 13

Section 13 prescribes the procedural and substantive legal requirements for altering a company's memorandum of association, including changes of name, registered office state, and business objects.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 13 requires a special resolution passed by shareholders for any alteration of the memorandum.
  • Operational Mechanism: Alteration of the company's name requires approval of the Central Government (delegated to ROC).
  • Procedural Rule: Shifting the registered office from one State to another requires Central Government (Regional Director) approval under sub-sections (4) and (5), requiring mandatory publication of notices, intimation to creditors, and resolution of objections.

Where a company alters its objects after raising money from the public through a prospectus without fully utilizing the funds, sub-section (8) requires a special resolution via postal ballot and an exit offer to dissenting shareholders at a price determined under SEBI regulations.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co. Ltd., In re (1967) 37 Comp Cas 516 (Cal): The High Court held that in shifting the registered office from one State to another under Section 13, the regulatory authority must balance the company's commercial autonomy against the legitimate interests of creditors, refusing sanction only if the transfer is fraudulent or mala fide.
  • Rank Film Distributors of India Ltd. v. Registrar of Companies (1969) 39 Comp Cas 123 (Cal): The High Court affirmed that a State Government or ROC cannot oppose the shifting of a company's registered office merely on the anticipated loss of revenue or employment, upholding the domestic corporate right to determine its administrative seat.
  • Orissa Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd., In re (1982) 52 Comp Cas 629: The court held that alteration of the object clause is a commercial decision for shareholders, and statutory authorities cannot substitute their business judgment for that of the company.
Legal Commentary:

Section 13 safeguards both sovereign revenue interests and shareholder rights. The stringent exit-offer mandate under Section 13(8) prevents corporate promoters from diverting public funds into unapproved speculative ventures. In registered office transfers, Regional Directors conduct rigorous scrutiny to confirm that the relocation is not an evasive maneuver to avoid pending state tax investigations or criminal proceedings.