Section 107: Voting by show of hands

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 107

Section 107 governs voting by a show of hands at general meetings, establishing the democratic baseline of 'one member, one vote' unless a formal poll is demanded under Section 109 or electronic voting is utilized, and declaring the Chairman's entry in the minutes to be conclusive evidence.

  • Democratic Show of Hands Baseline: Mandates that every resolution put to a general meeting shall be decided on a show of hands in the first instance, unless a poll is demanded or e-voting applies.
  • One Member, One Vote Principle: On a show of hands, every member present in person has exactly one vote, irrespective of the number of shares or quantum of paid-up capital held.
  • Exclusion of Proxies: Proxies are statutorily prohibited from voting on a show of hands unless the articles of the company expressly authorize them to do so.
  • Conclusiveness of Chairman's Declaration: Sub-section (2) provides that the Chairman's declaration that a resolution has been carried (unanimously or by a particular majority) and an entry to that effect in the minute book constitutes conclusive evidence, barring subsequent challenge absent fraud.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • E.D. Sassoon United Mills Ltd., In re, AIR 1929 Bom 38: Held that in voting by show of hands, voting power is counted by heads and not by shares; proxies cannot vote unless expressly sanctioned by the articles, and each personally present member has one vote.
  • Wall v. London and Northern Assets Corporation, [1899] 1 Ch 550: The Court of Appeal established that where a Chairman declares a resolution carried on a show of hands and enters it in the minutes, the declaration is conclusive evidence of the fact, precluding courts from re-counting votes unless fraud or manifest error appears on the face of the record.
  • Dhakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Nil Kamal Chakravarty, AIR 1937 Cal 645: Affirmed that while the Chairman's declaration is conclusive evidence under the statute, it does not validate a declaration that is plainly contrary to the actual facts recorded in the proceedings or where the Chairman acted fraudulently.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If representing a majority shareholder in a general meeting where the resolution is put to a show of hands, immediately demand a formal poll under Section 109 before or immediately after the Chairman's show of hands declaration. Once the meeting concludes without a poll demand, Section 107(2) makes the Chairman's declaration conclusive evidence, making it exceptionally difficult to overturn the outcome in NCLT litigation without proving fraud.