Home  /  Companies Act  /  Section 104

Section 104: Chairman of meetings

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Section 103 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 105
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)
Company Sec 2(20) Director Sec 2(34) Tribunal Sec 2(90)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 104

Section 104 regulates the election, powers, and role of the Chairman of a general meeting, establishing that members personally present shall elect one of themselves by a show of hands unless the articles provide an alternative governance mechanism or a poll is demanded.

  • Statutory Fallback for Chairmanship: Provides that unless the company's Articles designate a specific Chairman, the members personally present at the meeting shall elect one of their number to be Chairman on a show of hands.
  • Immediate Poll Demand Procedure: If a poll is demanded on the election of the Chairman, it must be taken immediately; the Chairman elected on a show of hands presides until the poll results are announced.
  • Automatic Succession of Poll Winner: If another individual is elected Chairman upon the conclusion of the poll, that person assumes the chair for the remainder of the general meeting.
  • Chairman's Inherent Powers and Duties: The Chairman is vested with statutory authority to maintain order, regulate discussions, ascertain the sense of the meeting, rule on points of order, and declare voting outcomes.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Narayandas Shreeram Somani v. Sangli Bank Ltd., AIR 1966 SC 170: The Supreme Court defined the legal duties of a company meeting Chairman, holding that the Chairman occupies a fiduciary position and must conduct proceedings with scrupulous impartiality, ensuring that the true will of the majority prevails.
  • National Dwellings Society v. Sykes, [1894] 3 Ch 341: Landmark English company law ruling: held that a Chairman cannot arbitrarily dissolve or adjourn a meeting against the will of the majority; if the Chairman improperly vacates the chair, members have the inherent legal right to elect another Chairman and proceed with the meeting.
  • Henderson v. Bank of Australasia, (1890) 45 Ch D 330: Affirmed that the Chairman's refusal to put a valid amendment or motion to vote invalidates the entire subsequent resolution passed at the general meeting.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In contentious general meetings where the designated Chairman abruptly purports to adjourn or dissolve the meeting without majority consent, advise attending shareholders to immediately record a formal protest, elect a substitute Chairman from amongst themselves under Section 104(1) on a show of hands, and continue the agenda. Ensure meticulous video recording and immediate preparation of parallel minutes signed by the newly elected Chairman.

Section 103 All 470 Sections of Companies Act Section 105