Section 102: Statement to be annexed to notice

Companies Act • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2013
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 102

Section 102 mandates that an Explanatory Statement setting out all material facts must be annexed to every notice convening a general meeting where special business is to be transacted.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 102 establishes that all business transacted at an EGM.
  • Appointment & Institutional Framework: All business transacted at an AGM except four ordinary matters (financial statements adoption, dividend declaration, director appointment, auditor appointment), constitutes 'special business'.

Sub-section (4) provides that if any promoter, director, or KMP derives personal benefit from a non-disclosed transaction, he holds that benefit in trust for the company.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. (1971) 41 Comp Cas 377 (Bom): The High Court established that the explanatory statement must disclose all material facts fully, frankly, and fairly; shareholders are entitled to know the true character and financial implications of resolutions before voting.
  • Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 9 SCC 449: The Supreme Court recognized that corporate disclosures in notices must satisfy statutory tests of fairness and materiality, enabling shareholders to exercise informed democratic voting.
Legal Commentary:

Section 102 embodies the principle of full disclosure in corporate democracy. Truncated, vague, or deceptive explanatory statements that disguise director conflict of interest, personal remuneration increases, or related-party dimensions invalidate the underlying resolution. In NCLT oppression proceedings, defective Section 102 statements are frequently cited to overturn corporate transactions.