Section 42: Central Advisory Board and State Advisory Boards

The Code on Wages, 2019 (Act No. 29 of 2019) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter V: Advisory Board
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 29 of 2019

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 42

Section 42 of the Code on Wages, 2019 establishes the statutory framework for Central and State Advisory Boards, mandating tripartite governance representing employers, employees, and independent experts, enforcing a landmark mandatory one-third female representation quota, and empowering boards to advise governments on minimum wage fixation, national floor wages, and the expansion of women's employment opportunities.

  • Tripartite Composition and Gender Parity Mandate: Advisory Boards must consist of equal numbers of employer and employee representatives, plus independent persons not exceeding one-third of the total membership. Sub-sections (3) and (6) introduce a mandatory requirement: at least one-third of the total members must be women, ensuring gender-responsive labor policy and combating structural wage discrimination.
  • Central Advisory Board Functions: The Central Board advises the Central Government on fixing and revising minimum wages, setting the national floor wage across geographical regions under Section 9, expanding female employment, and resolving inter-state wage coordination issues. It possesses powers to constitute specialized committees to conduct ground-level socioeconomic surveys.
  • State Advisory Boards Functions: State Boards advise State Governments on minimum wage schedules, wage differentials across skill categories and agro-climatic zones, and policies to enhance female labor force participation, bridging the gap between national floor standards and regional industrial realpolitik.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • People's Union for Democratic Rights (PUDR) v. Union of India (Asiad Workers Case) (1982) 3 SCC 235: The Supreme Court held that paying less than minimum wage constitutes 'forced labor' under Article 23 of the Constitution, emphasizing that advisory bodies and governmental wage fixation are constitutional imperatives to prevent human exploitation.
  • Sanjit Roy v. State of Rajasthan (1983) 1 SCC 525: The Supreme Court invalidated the payment of sub-minimum wages during famine relief works, holding that the State cannot bypass statutory minimum wage recommendations formulated by advisory mechanisms.
  • Chandra Bhavan Boarding and Lodging, Bangalore v. State of Mysore (1969) 3 SCC 84: The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of tripartite advisory boards in minimum wage determination, ruling that procedural flexibility in consultations does not violate natural justice so long as employer and employee views are evaluated fairly.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Corporate HR leaders, trade union representatives, and industry associations must actively monitor Advisory Board draft notifications, which form the bedrock of statutory minimum wage revisions and regional floor wages. Stakeholders should submit detailed cost-of-living indices, skill classifications, and regional inflation data during the public consultation window before draft recommendations are finalized into binding wage orders.