Home  /  Code on Social Security, 2020  /  Section 86

Section 86: Special provisions relating to persons recruited abroad

The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act No. 36 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter VII: Employee's Compensation
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 36 of 2020
Section 85 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 87

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 86

Section 86 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 enacts an extraterritorial protective regime for Indian citizens recruited within India for employment in overseas establishments, ships, oil platforms, or foreign projects, guaranteeing that domestic compensation entitlements remain enforceable against Indian recruiters, contracting principals, or domestic sponsoring employers.

  • Recruitment in India Condition Precedent: Applies expressly to any person who is recruited in India by or on behalf of an employer to work outside the territorial jurisdiction of India; the execution of the employment contract, recruitment processing, or selection within Indian territory constitutes the jurisdictional nexus subjecting the relationship to the statutory liabilities of Chapter VII.
  • Principal Employer and Contractor Joint Accountability: Where overseas recruitment is conducted through an overseas employment promoter, registered recruiting agent under the Emigration Act, 1983, or domestic service contractor, Section 86 treats the domestic contracting entity as a deemed employer for the purposes of statutory deposit and indemnification, closing jurisdictional loopholes used to evade liability.
  • Procedural Facilitation and Overseas Consular Inquiries: Empowers the Competent Authority to admit foreign medical certificates, injury reports, and diplomatic/consular depositions authenticated by Indian embassies or consulates in the destination country as admissible documentary evidence, dispensing with strict technical proof under domestic procedural codes.
  • Non-Duplication and Foreign Remedy Proviso: Expressly enacts that if an employee or their dependents have claimed, received, or compromised damages under the local compensation laws of the foreign state where the accident transpired, such foreign recovery must be fully credited against or completely bar duplicate proceedings before the domestic Competent Authority.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Executive Engineer, PWD v. Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation 1978 Lab IC 1420: The High Court held that the place where recruitment occurs creates an indelible statutory link, preventing an employer from defeating a compensation claim merely because the injury occurred beyond provincial or national boundaries.
  • State of Punjab v. Ram Singh (1992) 4 SCC 54: The Supreme Court affirmed that welfare enactments protecting personnel deployed on special extraterritorial assignments must receive broad purposive construction to prevent employers from abandoning injured personnel recruited domestically.
  • K.P. Poulose v. State of Kerala (1975) 2 SCC 236: Held that administrative authorities exercising quasi-judicial statutory powers must act on all relevant factual material, ensuring overseas verification mechanisms are utilized rather than summarily dismissing worker claims.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Recruitment agencies and multinational engineering companies executing turnkey projects abroad must institute robust overseas workmen compensation insurance policies before deploying Indian workers abroad. Employment contracts executed in India must explicitly articulate whether foreign statutory coverage or Indian Chapter VII compensation governs workplace accidents. In the event of a fatality or serious disablement abroad, counsel must immediately secure certified reports from the Indian Embassy in the host country and file an advance disclosure petition before the local Competent Authority to preempt coercive attachment proceedings.

Section 85 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 87