Home  /  Code on Social Security, 2020  /  Section 4

Section 4: Employees' State Insurance Corporation

The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act No. 36 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter II: Social Security Organisations
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 36 of 2020
Section 3 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 5

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 4

Section 4 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 provides for the constitution and incorporation of the Central Board of Trustees of the Employees' Provident Fund, establishing a tripartite body corporate endowed with perpetual succession and fiduciary responsibility over the national retirement corpus.

  • Statutory Tripartite Composition of the Central Board: The Central Board is constituted by the Central Government, comprising a Union Minister of Labour as Chairperson, a Vice-Chairperson, up to five Central Government representatives, up to fifteen State Government representatives, ten employer representatives, and ten employee representatives.
  • Body Corporate Status & Perpetual Succession: Under Section 4(2), the Central Board is a body corporate with perpetual succession and a common seal, possessing plenary legal capacity to acquire, hold, and dispose of property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued in its corporate name.
  • Fiduciary Ownership & Administration of Trust Funds: Vests absolute fiduciary ownership and administrative governance of the Provident Fund, Pension Fund, and Insurance Fund in the Central Board; investments must strictly conform to the investment patterns approved by the Ministry of Finance.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd. (2012) 2 SCC 489: The Supreme Court highlighted that the Central Board of Trustees acts as a statutory public trustee managing retirement savings on behalf of millions of industrial workers, and its regulatory decisions must be guided by strict fiduciary accountability and worker welfare.
  • B.P.L. Ltd. v. R.P.F.C. (2002) 10 SCC 408: The Supreme Court ruled that the administrative directions, conditions of exemption, and policy guidelines formulated by the Central Board carry statutory force and bind all covered establishments and private provident fund trusts.
  • Employees' Provident Fund Organisation v. Sunil Kumar B. (2022) SCC OnLine SC 1521: A 3-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court examined the regulatory and administrative competence of the Central Board and Central Government under the EPF Act, affirming the Central Board's role in maintaining the actuarial balance and financial stability of the Pension Fund.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In institutional litigation challenging administrative circulars, guidelines, or rate notifications issued by the EPFO, litigators must name the 'Board of Trustees, Employees' Provident Fund' as a statutory body corporate party rather than merely suing individual regional commissioners. When advising corporate trusts, strictly adhere to investment patterns issued by the Central Board, as unauthorized non-conforming investments trigger immediate trust cancellation under Section 21.

Section 3 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 5