Home  /  Code on Social Security, 2020  /  Section 39

Section 39: Benefits provided under ESI

The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act No. 36 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter IV: Employees' State Insurance Corporation
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 36 of 2020
Section 38 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 40

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 39

Section 39 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 establishes the core statutory entitlement to Medical Benefit, guaranteeing comprehensive, cashless medical attendance, hospitalisation, specialized surgical interventions, and pharmaceutical care to insured persons and their eligible families.

  • Comprehensive Scope of Medical Attendance: Section 39(1) entitles an insured person and their family members to medical attendance and treatment, encompassing out-patient care, specialist clinics, in-patient hospitalization, diagnostic testing, imaging, and essential pharmaceutical supplies.
  • Automatic Extension to Family Members: Section 39(2) guarantees that medical benefits extend to dependent family members (spouse, dependent children, dependent parents) from the date of the worker's statutory registration, subject to qualifying contribution conditions.
  • Scale & Delivery Mechanisms: Delivered through an extensive network of ESI dispensaries, Corporation hospitals, and tie-up private super-specialty hospitals, providing cashless medical care with zero out-of-pocket expenses for the insured.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Consumer Education & Research Centre v. Union of India (1995) 3 SCC 42: The Supreme Court held that the provision of medical care to industrial workers under statutory health insurance is an integral component of the fundamental right to life and health guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution.
  • Royal Western India Turf Club v. E.S.I.C. (2016) 4 SCC 521: The Supreme Court held that workers cannot be deprived of statutory medical benefits on account of administrative or contribution disputes between the employer and the Corporation.
  • ESIC v. Kuldeep Singh (1997) 1 SCC 269: The Supreme Court ruled that the Corporation has a continuous statutory obligation to provide necessary super-specialty medical treatment, and arbitrary refusals or delays in providing life-saving procedures are unconstitutional.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When an insured employee or registered dependent requires emergency super-specialty care (cardiology, oncology, organ transplants), obtain an immediate electronic referral via the ESIC Dhanwantri portal to an empaneled private hospital. If local ESI dispensaries delay issuing tie-up referrals in life-threatening situations, approach the EI Court or High Court under Article 226 for immediate mandatory medical injunctions.

Section 38 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 40