Home  /  Code on Social Security, 2020  /  Section 37

Section 37: General provisions as to payment of contributions

The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act No. 36 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter IV: Employees' State Insurance Corporation
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 36 of 2020
Section 36 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 38

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 37

Section 37 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 establishes the statutory adjudication framework for evaluating permanent disablement and loss of earning capacity, mandating assessment by independent Medical Boards, with structured appellate recourse to Medical Appeal Tribunals and the Employees' Insurance Court.

  • Mandatory Determination by Statutory Medical Boards: Section 37(1) mandates that any question whether an employment injury has resulted in permanent disablement and the exact percentage of loss of earning capacity must be determined by a duly constituted Medical Board of medical experts.
  • Statutory Right of Appeal to Medical Appeal Tribunal: Section 37(2) provides that an insured person or the Corporation aggrieved by a Medical Board determination may appeal within the prescribed timeframe to the Medical Appeal Tribunal, which possesses statutory power to affirm, modify, or set aside the assessment.
  • Judicial Review before Employees' Insurance Court: Section 37(3) guarantees judicial review before the Employees' Insurance (EI) Court against decisions of the Medical Appeal Tribunal or direct decisions of the Medical Board, ensuring full judicial oversight of medical disablement assessments.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar (2011) 1 SCC 343: The Supreme Court laid down foundational principles distinguishing physical medical impairment from functional loss of earning capacity, holding that loss of earning capacity must be judged with specific reference to the vocational duties of the injured worker.
  • ESIC v. Francis De Costa (1996) 6 SCC 1: The Supreme Court held that Medical Board assessments of disablement percentages constitute expert findings of fact that cannot be casually displaced by courts in the absence of manifest error or fraud.
  • Regional Director, ESIC v. Babu Rao (1996) 2 LLJ 1121 (SC): The Supreme Court held that High Courts and EI Courts cannot substitute their own arbitrary medical estimates of disability for the findings of statutory medical boards without remitting the matter to an appellate medical board.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In disablement proceedings before the Medical Board or EI Court, legal counsel must distinguish between physical anatomical damage and functional occupational loss. A machine turner who suffers a 20% finger amputation may suffer a 100% loss of earning capacity in their specific trade. Present detailed job descriptions, vocational demand matrices, and employer wage records to secure a realistic functional disablement rating.

Section 36 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 38