Home  /  Code on Social Security, 2020  /  Section 18

Section 18: Authorisation of employer to maintain provident fund account

The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act No. 36 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter III: Employees' Provident Fund
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 36 of 2020
Section 17 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 19

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 18

Section 18 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 establishes direct statutory harmonisation with the Income-tax Act, 1961, conferring deemed recognition upon the Provident Fund under Part A of the Fourth Schedule to ensure complete income tax deductibility for employers and tax-exempt retirement accumulations for employees.

  • Deemed Recognised Provident Fund Status: Section 18 mandates that the Provident Fund established under Chapter III shall be deemed to be a recognised provident fund for the purposes of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dispensing with individual trust registration under tax laws.
  • Employer Tax Deduction under Section 36(1)(iv): Ensures that contributions remitted by employers to the Provident Fund, Pension Fund, and EDLI Fund qualify as fully deductible business expenditures in profit and loss accounts, provided remittances occur before statutory due dates.
  • Employee Tax Shield & Superannuation Exemption: Accumulated balances paid to an employee upon retirement or termination after five years of continuous service are entirely exempt from income tax, subject to statutory annual interest taxation caps under Section 10(11) and 10(12) of the Income-tax Act.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Checkmate Services P. Ltd. v. CIT (2022) SCC OnLine SC 1423: The Supreme Court held that deduction of employee contributions under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act is allowable only if remitted to the statutory fund on or before the due date specified in the labor statute; late payment before filing tax returns does not cure the default.
  • CIT v. Textool Co. Ltd. (2013) 5 SCC 523: The Supreme Court held that contributions to statutory employee welfare funds are allowable business deductions provided they are irrevocably deposited into recognized statutory funds.
  • Alom Extrusions Ltd. v. CIT (2010) 1 SCC 489: The Supreme Court explained the legislative intent behind harmonizing labor welfare remittances with income tax deductibility to incentivize timely employer compliance.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Finance directors and tax heads must strictly enforce the 15th-of-the-month remittance deadline for EPF contributions. Under the Supreme Court's ruling in Checkmate Services, any delay in remitting employee PF deductions results in permanent disallowance under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act, generating massive income tax demands that cannot be reversed even upon subsequent payment.

Section 17 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 19