Section 140: Power of officers to impose penalty

The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act No. 36 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter XII: Offences and Penalties
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 36 of 2020

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 140

Section 140 of the Code establishes an in-house administrative adjudication framework, empowering an officer not below the rank of Under Secretary to the Government to impose monetary penalties for minor administrative non-compliances.

  • Administrative Monetary Penalty Mechanism: Decouples minor regulatory defaults from the criminal justice system, empowering administrative adjudicators to levy statutory fines.
  • Principles of Natural Justice Mandatory: Requires the adjudicating officer to issue a written show-cause notice, disclose all adverse inspection records, and grant a personal hearing before imposing penalties.
  • Objective Discretionary Criteria: Directs the adjudicating officer to consider the size of the establishment, duration of default, and repeat nature of non-compliance while determining penalty amounts.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • SEBI v. Shriram Mutual Fund (2006) 5 SCC 361: Supreme Court affirmed that civil administrative penalties are strictly non-penal; once a statutory breach is proved, penalty follows as a matter of course without requiring proof of mens rea.
  • Union of India v. CERC (2010) 4 SCC 603: Affirmed that administrative adjudicators must act quasi-judicially and pass reasoned orders supported by tangible evidence.
  • Siemens Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Union of India (1976) 2 SCC 981: Affirmed that administrative penalty orders must record speaking reasons to withstand judicial scrutiny.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

During administrative penalty hearings under Section 140, submit proof of prompt voluntary rectification and demonstrate zero economic gain from the procedural default to argue for minimal penalty imposition.