Home  /  Code on Social Security, 2020  /  Section 11

Section 11: Medical Benefit Committee

The Code on Social Security, 2020 (Act No. 36 of 2020) • Official Statutory Text & Plain English Practice Guide

Statutory Mandate
Chapter II: Social Security Organisations
Competent Labour Forum
Act No. 36 of 2020
Section 10 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 12

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 11

Section 11 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 vests sovereign authority in the appropriate Government to supersede any Social Security Organisation upon establishing persistent default, statutory abuse of power, or administrative paralysis, subject to mandatory natural justice requirements and a six-month reconstitution ceiling.

  • Statutory Grounds for Executive Supersession: Section 11(1) empowers the appropriate Government to supersede the Central Board, ESIC, National Social Security Board, or State Boards if the body commits persistent default in performing statutory duties, acts in excess or abuse of delegated powers, or violates binding Government directives.
  • Mandatory Show-Cause Notice & Procedural Due Process: Prior to issuing an official supersession notification in the Gazette, the Government is statutorily mandated to serve a written notice specifying detailed grounds and provide a reasonable opportunity for the concerned Organisation to show cause against dissolution.
  • Six-Month Temporal Cap & Reconstitution Mandate: Section 11(2) and Section 11(3) dictate that during supersession, all powers vest in a designated government officer and all assets vest in the appropriate Government; critically, the supersession cannot exceed six months, requiring mandatory reconstitution of the tripartite board before the expiry of that period.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of M.P. v. Dharam Bir (1998) 6 SCC 165: The Supreme Court held that the power to supersede statutory public boards is an extraordinary sovereign intervention that cannot be exercised on subjective dissatisfaction; the executive must demonstrate objective jurisdictional facts showing complete failure of statutory functions.
  • Indian National Congress (I) v. Institute of Social Welfare (2002) 5 SCC 685: The Supreme Court ruled that statutory powers to dissolve or supersede autonomous statutory institutions must be strictly construed and exercised in scrupulous adherence to the principles of natural justice.
  • Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd. (2012) 2 SCC 489: Reiterated that social security bodies exist to serve the working class; executive intervention under supersession clauses is designed as a corrective tool to prevent institutional failure or fiduciary breach.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If a Social Security Organisation or State Welfare Board is served with a notice under Section 11, the executive committee must immediately compile comprehensive operational dossiers detailing compliance with government circulars, fund performance metrics, and meeting minutes. Litigators challenging arbitrary supersession orders must invoke writ jurisdiction under Article 226, demonstrating that the jurisdictional prerequisites of Section 11 were not satisfied and that the dissolution was politically motivated.

Section 10 All 163 Sections of Code on Social Security, 2020 Section 12