Section 65 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document produced

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2023
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 65

Section 65 requires that if a document is alleged to be signed or to have been written wholly or in part by any person, the signature or the handwriting of so much of the document as is alleged to be in that person's handwriting must be proved to be in their handwriting.

  • Strict Proof of Execution: A document does not prove itself; the signature or handwriting must be verified by credible testimony or comparison.
  • Available Proof Modes: May be proved by: the executant themselves, an eyewitness to the signing, a person acquainted under Section 41, or an expert under Section 39.
  • Civil & Criminal Application: Applies universally to commercial contracts, promissory notes, receipts, agreements to sell, and threatening notes.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • K.S. Satyanarayana v. V.R. Narayana Rao (1999) 6 SCC 122: The Supreme Court held that mere marking of an exhibit does not dispense with proof of execution under Section 67 IEA (Section 65 BSA); the party relying on the document must prove the handwriting of the executant.
  • Sudhir Engineering Co. v. Nitco Roadways Ltd. (1995) 34 DRJ 86: Affirmed that admission of a document into evidence is distinct from proof of its contents or execution; execution must be proved by the signatory or eyewitnesses.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Do not assume that because the adverse party failed to deny a signature in pleadings, execution is proved. If execution is placed in issue, call the attesting witness or scribe to establish the physical act of signing under Section 65.