Section 132 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Professional communications

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2023
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 132

Section 132 codifies Professional Communications Privilege, protecting confidential attorney-client communications from disclosure.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 132 (formerly Section 126 IEA) provides that no advocate shall at any time be permitted, unless with their client's express consent, to disclose any communication made to them in the course.
  • Operational Application: For the purpose of their employment, or to state the contents or condition of any document with which they have become acquainted in the course of professional employment, or to disclose any advice given by them to their client.

Section 132 anchors the administration of justice by guaranteeing absolute confidentiality to client-attorney communications, preserving candid legal consultation without fear of compelled disclosure.

The privilege is perpetual, extending beyond termination of employment. The only exceptions are: (1) any communication made in furtherance of any illegal purpose; or (2) any fact showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of employment.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Municipal Corp. of Greater Bombay v. Vijay Metal Works (1982) 1 SCC 547: Affirmed that attorney-client privilege under Section 126 IEA / Section 132 BSA is foundational to the administration of justice and cannot be breached without express client waiver.
  • Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs v. Satyen Bhowmick (1981) 2 SCC 109: Reiterated that professional consultations between an advocate and accused are strictly privileged.
Legal Commentary:

Section 132 is the bedrock of the legal profession. A citizen accused of a crime or involved in high-stakes corporate disputes must be able to make full, candid disclosures to their legal counsel without fear that the lawyer will be compelled by the police or court to testify against them.