Section 125 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Witness unable to communicate verbally

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2023
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 125

Section 125 provides that a witness who is unable to speak may give their evidence in any other manner in which they can make it intelligible, such as by writing or by signs made in open Court, treating such evidence as oral evidence.

  • Inclusive Communication Modes: Admits evidence given by mute or speech-impaired witnesses through: (1) writing in open court, (2) sign language, or (3) recognized interpretation.
  • Video Recording Mandate: Expressly mandates that where signs are used, the proceedings shall be video recorded, ensuring visual record integrity.
  • Treated as Oral Evidence: Evidence written in open court or interpreted through signs is statutorily classified as oral evidence under Section 54 BSA.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Rajasthan v. Darshan Singh (2012) 5 SCC 789: The Supreme Court held that the testimony of a deaf and mute witness recorded through signs and interpreted by an expert under Section 119 IEA (Section 125 BSA) is fully admissible and credible.
  • Chhotu v. State of Maharashtra (1997) 9 SCC 272: Affirmed that if a mute witness can read and write, writing in open court is the preferred mode of examination.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When examining a speech-impaired witness, move an application under Section 125 BSA to engage a certified sign-language interpreter from a recognized institute, and request the court to arrange mandatory video recording of the testimony.