Section 121 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Estoppel

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2023
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 121

Section 121 codifies the equitable doctrine of Estoppel, preventing a party who has made a representation from subsequently resiling from it to the detriment of another.

  • Core Legal Standard: Section 121 (formerly Section 115 IEA) dictates that when one person has, by their declaration, act, or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true.
  • Operational Application: To act upon such belief, neither they nor their representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between themselves and such person, to deny the truth of that thing.

Section 121 protects commercial and legal reliance by precluding a party from retracting unequivocal representations that have induced another to alter their position.

Estoppel is founded on good conscience and equity: a party cannot blow hot and cold (approbate and reprobate). Once an individual induces another to alter their position based on a representation, the law estops them from asserting the contrary.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of U.P. (1979) 2 SCC 409: A landmark constitutional ruling establishing the doctrine of Promissory Estoppel against the Government, holding that the state is bound by promises upon which citizens have acted.
  • B.L. Sreedhar v. K.M. Munireddy (2003) 2 SCC 355: Analyzed the essential ingredients of statutory estoppel under Section 115 IEA / Section 121 BSA.
Legal Commentary:

Section 121 is a rule of civil evidence with immense constitutional and commercial ramifications. In administrative law, it prevents governments from arbitrarily withdrawing tax exemptions or tender commitments after commercial parties have invested capital in reliance on state promises.