Section 11 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Facts relevant when right or custom is in question

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Statutory Regulation
Legal Standard
Competent Court / Tribunal
Act 2023
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 11

Section 11 codifies the evidentiary framework for proving the existence, modification, or termination of legal rights and customary practices, admitting historical transactions and specific instances of exercise.

  • Custom under Indian: Custom under Indian law has the binding force of statute if it satisfies the rigorous legal criteria of being ancient, certain, reasonable, continuous.
  • Core Legal Standard: Under Section 11 of the BSA, facts showing the existence of any custom or right are relevant, provided the custom is ancient, certain, reasonable, and not opposed to public policy.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Collector of Madura v. Moottoo Ramalinga Sathupathy (1868) 12 Moo IA 397: The Privy Council laid down the celebrated maxim that under Indian jurisprudence, 'clear proof of usage will outweigh the written text of the law', establishing that authentic customary practice proved by unbroken historical transactions overrides statutory presumptions.
  • Lakshmidhar Misra v. Rangalal (AIR 1950 PC 56): Ruled that customary rights must be established by clear, unambiguous evidence demonstrating continuous and peaceable enjoyment from time immemorial, and that casual, permissive use cannot ripen into a binding customary right under this section.
Legal Commentary:

Litigators establishing or contesting customary rights must assemble an unbroken chain of historical documentation under Section 11. Certified copies of ancient revenue records, archival settlement registers, and prior judicial decrees recognizing the right—even between different parties—are admissible to demonstrate continuous assertion.