Section 104 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023: Burden of proof

Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Evidentiary Burden
Trial Principle
All Courts in India
Act 2023
Statutory Defined Terms in this Section: (Click any term for official legal definition)

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 104

Section 104 defines the foundational Burden of Proof, establishing that whoever desires any Court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability must prove the existence of facts asserted.

  • Evidentiary Proof & Admissibility: Section 104 (formerly Section 101 IEA) provides that whoever desires any Court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which they assert, must prove that those facts exist.
  • Operational Evidentiary Proof & Admissibility: When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact, it is said that the burden of proof lies on that person.

In criminal trials, Section 104 establishes the golden thread of criminal jurisprudence: the primary burden rests invariably upon the prosecution to prove every ingredient of the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra (1984) 4 SCC 116: Reiterated that the burden of proving guilt lies squarely on the prosecution and never shifts in criminal trials.
  • Rangammal v. Kuppuswami (2011) 12 SCC 220: Held that under Section 101 IEA / Section 104 BSA, the burden lies on the plaintiff to establish their case, and they cannot succeed on the weakness of the defendant's case.
Legal Commentary:

Section 104 embodies the fundamental principle *actori incumbit probatio* (the burden of proof lies on the claimant). In criminal law, this burden remains anchored to the prosecution from the first witness to final argument.