Section 22 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Sentences which High Courts and Sessions Judges may pass

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 • Official Statutory Text & Practice Guide

Procedural Safeguards
Police Powers & Rights
Judicial Magistrate 1st Class / High Court
Formerly Sec 28 CrPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 22

Section 22 defines the sentences which High Courts and Sessions Judges may lawfully pass, establishing the statutory limits of sovereign sentencing power.

  • High Court Sentencing Power: A High Court may pass any sentence authorised by law.
  • Sessions Judge & Additional Sessions Judge: May pass any sentence authorised by law; but any sentence of death passed by such judge shall be subject to confirmation by the High Court under Section 407 BNSS.
  • Omission of Assistant Sessions Judge: The BNSS eliminates the intermediate post of Assistant Sessions Judge, standardizing the sessions trial tier.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684: The Constitution Bench settled the 'rarest of rare cases' doctrine for capital sentencing, affirming that the statutory confirmation mechanism guarantees comprehensive appellate scrutiny.
  • Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra (2009) 6 SCC 498: Reiterated that capital sentences passed by Sessions Courts remain inchoate until confirmed by a Division Bench of the High Court.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Whenever a Sessions Judge imposes capital punishment, execution is automatically stayed. The court must submit the proceedings to the High Court under Section 407 BNSS, giving the convict a statutory right to re-argue entire evidence.