Section 8: Amount of Fine, Liability in Default of Payment of Fine

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter II: Of Punishments • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter II: Of Punishments
Trial Court
Non-Applicable
Non-Applicable
Formerly Sec 63 & 64 IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 8

Section 8 provides comprehensive rules regarding the amount of fine, the liability of the offender in default of payment of fine, and the proportional scale of imprisonment for non-payment.

  • Reasonable Fine Mandate: Where no sum is expressed to which a fine may extend, the amount of fine to which the offender is liable is unlimited, but shall not be excessive.
  • Statutory Default Scale: Where the offence is punishable with fine only: default imprisonment shall not exceed 2 months for fine up to ₹5,000, 4 months for fine up to ₹10,000, and 1 year in any other case.
  • Simple Default Custody: Default imprisonment for fine-only offences shall be simple imprisonment; for offences punishable with imprisonment and fine, default custody can be up to one-fourth of the maximum term.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Shahejadkhan Mahebubkhan Pathan v. State of Gujarat (2013) 1 SCC 570: The Supreme Court held that default sentences for non-payment of fine must be reasonable and proportional; an indigent convict cannot be condemned to excessive default imprisonment contrary to Section 64-67 IPC (Section 8 BNS).
  • Shantilal v. State of M.P. (2007) 11 SCC 243: Affirmed that default imprisonment is not a sentence for the substantive crime, but a coercive civil-penal process to recover the fine; default sentences cannot run concurrently.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

If your client is indigent and facing excessive default sentences across multiple charges, cite Section 8 BNS and praying for reduction of default terms to run concurrently or at the statutory minimum, demonstrating inability to pay.