Section 77: Voyeurism

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter V: Of Offences Against Women & Children • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter V: Of Offences Against Women & Children
Court of Session
Bailable (1st) / Non-Bailable (Subsequent)
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 354C IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 77

Section 77 penalizes voyeurism, criminalizing the act of watching, capturing, or disseminating images of a woman engaging in a private act where she would usually have the expectation of not being observed, prescribing imprisonment up to three years for first conviction, and up to seven years for repeat conviction.

  • Expectation of Privacy: The woman must be engaging in a private act (using the lavatory, undressing, sexual act) where she reasonably expects privacy.
  • Three Prohibited Acts: Captures: (1) Watching, (2) Capturing the image/video, or (3) Disseminating the image/video.
  • Consensual Capture but Non-Consensual Sharing: Express Explanation: if the woman consented to the capture of the image but did NOT consent to its dissemination to third persons, sharing constitutes voyeurism.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Aman Kumar v. State of Haryana (2004) 4 SCC 379: Examined electronic and sexual offences against women, noting that non-consensual surveillance strikes at fundamental privacy under Article 21.
  • K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1: A nine-judge bench recognized informational privacy and bodily autonomy as fundamental rights, reinforcing statutory protections against voyeurism.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In revenge porn and digital privacy prosecutions, Explanation 2 to Section 77 BNS is crucial: even if the victim consensually shared private photos with a partner, the partner's forwarding of those images to third parties constitutes completed voyeurism.