Section 72: Disclosure of Identity of Victim of Sexual Offences

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter V: Of Offences Against Women & Children • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter V: Of Offences Against Women & Children
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 228A IPC

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 72

Section 72 penalizes the disclosure of the identity of victims of certain sexual offences, prescribing imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and fine, safeguarding victim privacy and social dignity.

  • Absolute Victim Anonymity: Prohibits printing or publishing the name or any matter which may disclose the identity of any victim of sexual offences (Sections 64 to 71 BNS).
  • Media & Digital Publication Scope: Applies to newspapers, television channels, social media platforms, websites, and legal publications.
  • Strict Exceptions Only: Permitted only: (1) By or under the order of the police officer conducting investigation in good faith, (2) By authorization of the victim in writing, or (3) By next of kin if victim is deceased or minor.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Nipun Saxena v. Union of India (2019) 2 SCC 703: The Supreme Court issued sweeping national guidelines under Section 228A IPC (Section 72 BNS): no person can print or publish in print, electronic, social media, or in any other manner, the name of the victim or remote details (photograph, school, family) that reveal identity.
  • State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996) 2 SCC 384: Held that trial courts must conduct sexual offence trials in camera and suppress victim identity to shield survivors from secondary trauma.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In drafting bail applications, written statements, or appellate paper books in sexual offence cases, mask the victim's name as 'Victim X' and redact addresses: any failure to mask constitutes an actionable criminal offence under Section 72 BNS.