Home  /  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita  /  Section 53

Section 53: Abetment when Effect Caused is Different

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter IV: Of Abetment, Criminal Conspiracy & Attempt • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter IV: Of Abetment, Criminal Conspiracy & Attempt
Court by which offence abetted is triable
According as offence abetted is bailable or non-bailable
According as offence abetted is cognizable or non-cognizable
Formerly Sec 113 IPC
Section 52 All 358 Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 54

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 53

Section 53 establishes that when an act is abetted with the intention on the part of the abettor of causing a particular effect, and an act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment causes a different effect from that intended, the abettor is liable for the effect caused, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had abetted the act with the intention of causing that effect, provided he knew that the act abetted was likely to cause that effect.

  • Different Physical Outcome: Applies where the intended physical effect escalates (e.g. A instigates B to cause grievous hurt to Z, and B inflicts injuries that kill Z).
  • Knowledge of Likelihood: The abettor is liable for the escalated result (homicide) IF they knew that the assault was likely to cause death.
  • Foreseeability Anchor: Ties culpability to subjective foresight and objective likelihood of the lethal result.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of U.P. v. Madan Mohan (1989) Supp (2) SCC 584: The Supreme Court analyzed Section 113 IPC (Section 53 BNS), holding that the abettor's liability for death caused during an assault depends strictly on whether the abettor knew death was a likely consequence.
  • Girja Prasad v. State of M.P. (2007) 7 SCC 625: Affirmed that constructive liability for escalated outcomes requires clear proof of knowledge under evidentiary standards.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In prosecutions where an assault led to death, cross-examine the doctor on whether the injuries were inherently lethal or whether death resulted from medical negligence or pre-existing disease: this disproves that death was a 'likely effect' known to your client under Section 53.

Section 52 All 358 Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 54