Home  /  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita  /  Section 50

Section 50: Abetment with Different Intention from Abettor

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter IV: Of Abetment, Criminal Conspiracy & Attempt • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter IV: Of Abetment, Criminal Conspiracy & Attempt
Court by which offence abetted is triable
According as offence abetted is bailable or non-bailable
According as offence abetted is cognizable or non-cognizable
Formerly Sec 110 IPC
Section 49 All 358 Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 51

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 50

Section 50 governs the liability of an abettor when the person abetted acts with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, providing that the abettor shall be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been committed if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other.

  • Subjective Mens Rea Standard: The abettor is judged strictly by THEIR OWN intention and knowledge, not by the autonomous, depraved intent of the physical perpetrator.
  • Protection Against Escalation: If A instigates B to commit simple assault, and B harboring secret personal malice murders the victim, A is punished for abetting assault, not murder.
  • Severability of Co-Accused Intent: Insulates an abettor from the independent, aggravated malice of the physical perpetrator.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • Mathurala Adi Reddy v. State of Hyderabad (AIR 1956 SC 177): The Supreme Court held that under Section 110 IPC (Section 50 BNS), an abettor's culpability is determined strictly by the intention or knowledge they possessed at the time of abetment.
  • State of U.P. v. Madan Mohan (1989) Supp (2) SCC 584: Affirmed that the abettor cannot be fastened with the escalated criminal intent of the principal offender unless shared.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

When representing an accused charged with abetting an escalated homicide, cite Section 50 BNS: establish that your client's communication was limited to recovering a debt or scuffling, and that the principal's lethal attack was an independent act.

Section 49 All 358 Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 51